About a year ago I switched to ZFS for Proxmox so that I wouldn’t be running technology preview.

Btrfs gave me no issues for years and I even replaced a dying disk with no issues. I use raid 1 for my Proxmox machines. Anyway I moved to ZFS and it has been a less that ideal experience. The separate kernel modules mean that I can’t downgrade the kernel plus the performance on my hardware is abysmal. I get only like 50-100mb/s vs the several hundred I would get with btrfs.

Any reason I shouldn’t go back to btrfs? There seems to be a community fear of btrfs eating data or having unexplainable errors. That is sad to hear as btrfs has had lots of time to mature in the last 8 years. I would never have considered it 5-6 years ago but now it seems like a solid choice.

Anyone else pondering or using btrfs? It seems like a solid choice.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
26 points

You shouldn’t have abysmal performance with ZFS. Something must be up.

permalink
report
reply
-8 points
*

What’s up is ZFS. It is solid but the architecture is very dated at this point.

There are about a hundred different settings I could try to change but at some point it is easier to go btrfs where it works out of the box.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Since most people with decently simple setups don’t have the described problem likely somethings up with your setup.

Yes ifta old and yes it’s complicated but it doesn’t have to be to get a decent performance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have been trying to get ZFS working well for months. Also I am not the only one having issues as I have seen lots of other posts about similar problems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I used to run a mirror for a while with WD USB disks. Didn’t notice any performance problems. Used Ubuntu LTS which has a built-in ZFS module, not DKMS, although I doubt there’s performance problems stemming from DKMS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What seems dated in its architecture? Last time I looked at it, it struck me as pretty modern compared to what’s in use today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

It doesn’t share well. Anytime anything IO heavy happens the system completely locks up.

That doesn’t happen on other systems

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You have angered the zfs gods!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I have gotten a ton of people to help me. Sometimes it is easier to piss people off to gather info and usage tips.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’ve been downvoted, but I’ve seen a fair share of ZFS implementations confirm your assessment.

E.g. “Don’t use ZFS if you care about performance, especially on SSD” is a fairly common refrain in response to anyone asking about how to get the best performance out of their solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 23K

    Comments