You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No it’s not irrelevant. If it was the laws should be removed. As it stands they exist and are therefore pertinent.

A fetus is a fetus, until it is a child it is a lump of cells and therefore no one should be forced to carry a fetus. It is not murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s relevant because it is. And now you’ve moved onto strawman fallacies. Try to argue in good faith :)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Leopards Ate My Face

!leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

Create post

Rules:

  • If you don’t already have some understanding of what this is, try reading this post. Off-topic posts will be removed.
  • Please use a high-quality source to explain why your post fits if you think it might not be common knowledge and isn’t explained within the post itself.
  • Links to articles should be high-quality sources – for example, not the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Newsweek, etc. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it’s marked in red, it probably isn’t allowed; if it’s yellow, exercise caution.
  • The mods are fallible; if you’ve been banned or had a comment removed, you’re encouraged to appeal it.
  • For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the comments.
  • All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 78

    Posts

  • 3.1K

    Comments