668

Imperial rule(lemmy.blahaj.zone)

posted
by
Avatar
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
in
Avatar
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
176 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
17 points

I think you may have misunderstood me. I’m not saying that imperialism is justified because of the possibility of a vacuum, I’m saying that the possibility of a vacuum is an acceptable risk for the sake of opposing imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

196

!196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

other rules

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 73K

    Comments

Community moderators