You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Full agree with you

but also he did say the school would blow up

Arrest? Probably too much.

Responding to him saying the school will blow up? Maybe something that should be done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Na, screw that. The police are a danger to marginalised people and should not be called out for (anything, but especially not) something that could be cleared up in a matter of minutes by the school, or at most, social services. By calling them, the person who does actively puts marginalised people’s life at risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The principal told Ty’s mom in an email that if Ty said something similar again, the school would follow the same protocol.

Instead of the principal having a single brain cell capable of empathy, they decided that instead of engaging with the child and treating them with respect, they will catastrophize the child’s colloquialisms into intentional bomb threats.

They know the child has used the term “blow up” to mean “blow up emotionally”/the child is in trouble. They are intentionally punishing the child for nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They are intentionally punishing the child for nothing. being different

Otherwise you’re spot on, this whole thing was entirely unnecessary and avoidable, if only those in positions of power wanted to avoid it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@midwest.social

Create post

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

Community stats

  • 5.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 4.9K

    Comments