You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
2 points
*

Okay for real though… storage size? Terrible I agree.

But I’ve been kinda obsessed lately with the form factor of diskettes. They’re:

  • Not super easy to lose (looking at for you, nanoSD)
  • They’re easily labeled.
  • Unlike flash drives, aren’t vulnerable to snagging and getting ripped out of the machine or damaging the port when inserted.
  • Easily stacked or filed away.
  • Most importantly: Make a nice satisfying “ka-chunk” when inserting into a drive.
  • Satisfyingly fly out of said drive when you push the eject button firmly.

Nowadays, if we made a diskette that basically replaced the magnetic disc with flash memory, and the shutter protected the connectors, you could hypothetically store like 1TB in that space, it could likely be read super fast, and would obviously be way more reliable than the old “Oh no a speck of dust ruined my 2MB file” of old floppies.

I’d even settle for an open standard akin to Sony’s chunky little Memory Sticks…I liked those.

permalink
report
reply

retrocomputing

!retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

Community stats

  • 529

    Monthly active users

  • 102

    Posts

  • 202

    Comments