You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
108 points
*

on linux? nah.

try using windows on a machine that old if you want to know the true meaning of slow. it will always be updating something meaningless like edge in the background on top of it.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Me, who still daily drives an Intel Skylake laptop from 2015: 🤡

The boot time isn’t actually that bad, it’s like 6 seconds with Win10 and an SSD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Your Skylake laptop from 2015 boots faster than my Zen 4 desktop from 2022 (with a PCIe Gen 4 NVME SSD!)

This thing takes 25 seconds just to POST. The fucked up thing is that it used to be even worse, but has slowly been improving with BIOS updates. The good news is that once it’s up and running, this machine is ready to fuck. Programs open the second I click the icon and loading screens don’t exist in games anymore. But it’s still disappointing that AMD can’t figure out how to make their shit boot faster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s an issue with ddr5 memory checks. You can disable the checks but you might get instability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Edit I misread that, I thought you had a Zenbook not the AMD desktop lol 🙈

That’s actually insane because mine is also an Asus Zenbook. It’s the UX501 that I got at a liquidation sale, and I refuse to give this thing up because they really don’t make them like this anymore.

I’ll probably eventually move onto a Framework once this thing gives up the ghost, but I’m hoping for at least a few more years of use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

skylake with an ssd is not that bad tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Skylake + SSD here, fine for office usage even on Win10

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I love having it idle at 100% for 30 mins, fan at max, just to update some windows nonsense. Updating 500 packages on linux is done in 5 mins including the download. Like how do you even manage to make the update process THAT bad if not on purpose? I am baffled by that. It’s a thinkpad dual core i7 with an SSD. It only runs Debian now thankfully.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

right? i literally can’t fathom it and i’m not even counting all the crap 3rd parties insist in adding as always running system services for some damn reason. linux was a godsend to switch to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I still have my old laptop from college for whenever my PC is dead and I need a backup device. It’s from 2008 and still has an HDD. There’s Windows 7 installed and last time i booted it up the boot up time said 316 seconds. It’s ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My Commodore 64 boots up in like 4 seconds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Have they fixed that 100% disk usage bug in Windows yet? Seems to disproportionately affect laptops with magnetic disk’s and just chokes the whole system making it unusable

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Is that what the fuck I’ve been experiencing?

Jesus Christ this is it I’m finding a damn DVD and getting Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m throwing the damn SSD away and getting a new one to install Gentoo on

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

not technically a bug, its updates and other stuff thats still notoriously heavy on windows. you can usually see what it is on the task manager.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

its not a bug, its a feature. its updates, telemetry and other stuff they want you to use like edge. you can see it for yourself on the task manager.

you can use some feature disabler apps to cut out a lot of this crap but theres only so much you can do on windows. updates are crazy heavy for what they are.

it is however a substantial improvement, they undo the mods on update and you will have to play little a cat and mouse game to keep it good.

windows can be improved but linux is the permanent solution for weaker hardware if you can use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes but their RAM management (even though the desktop may use too much by default) seems way better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

On windows? WHAT? You drunk? Linux has zram. This is where the discussion ends immediately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

ZRAM is also not about RAM management. I am talking about the oomd

If on Windows a process is using extremely much resources, mostly you still can open a GUI task manager amd kill it. On KDE if this happens, I am lucky if I can exit to a TTY

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 929

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments