You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

exactly!

and i am always in favor of counting with fingers. we were given them for a reason, might as well make the most of them. counting is hard enough as it is

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Counting cohomology has done to me a numbers x_x

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

yeah cohomology can be particularly rough. look on the bright side though, at least you now have the tools to answer this question:

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No, counting with fingers is bad. Count with phalanges instead. It’s more efficient

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just be sure to do it in binary. You gotta squeeze all of the value out of those phalanges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s impossible, because it would require tracking each digit at once. Counting in binary is kind of possible with fingers, but not with phalanges.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 42K

    Comments