The baby is alive during the entire pregnancy. Abortionists make the claim that itâs not or itâs a âclump of cellsâ to excuse their actions (murder). Adoption is always a choice the childâs parents could pursue. And killing a baby because it might have a âshitty lifeâ is just a pathetic argument. Would you rather have a shitty life or be dead? Most people would rather be alive but the baby doesnât even get a choice in the matter.
Adoption isnât an option when there is a miscarriage. Women are dying because miscarriages canât be properly dealt with due to anti-abortion laws.
Example: https://www.propublica.org/article/josseli-barnica-death-miscarriage-texas-abortion-ban
Adoption is always a choice
Youâve clearly never actually tried to adopt a baby.
Also, good luck if you want to adopt, but youâre the wrong religion.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/24/project-2025-adoption-fostering
No, the mother can put her child up for adoption rather than have it murdered.
Hell, Iâm sure the child would rather be abandoned than killed.
Congratulations on not even bothering to open the link long enough to read the headline. That sort of total lack of curiosity is impossible to rebut. You canât rebut ânuh-uh.â
By the way, do you know it can cost thousands of dollars to adopt the baby? Even if you arenât the wrong religion?
