Pretty big difference between jerking off into a sock and ripping a baby apart limb by limb then crushing its skull.
XD there is a big chance that you troll , hat off you got me: D. If not you have to know that during a big period of the pregnancy the baby is not alive and even if he was did you consider that may be if his mother goes to the end of her pregnancy but donât / canât take care of her baby he will have a shitty life and his mother too? If you want a baby even a baby that was not planned well you keep it.
The baby is alive during the entire pregnancy. Abortionists make the claim that itâs not or itâs a âclump of cellsâ to excuse their actions (murder). Adoption is always a choice the childâs parents could pursue. And killing a baby because it might have a âshitty lifeâ is just a pathetic argument. Would you rather have a shitty life or be dead? Most people would rather be alive but the baby doesnât even get a choice in the matter.
Adoption is always a choice
Youâve clearly never actually tried to adopt a baby.
Also, good luck if you want to adopt, but youâre the wrong religion.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/24/project-2025-adoption-fostering
Adoption isnât an option when there is a miscarriage. Women are dying because miscarriages canât be properly dealt with due to anti-abortion laws.
Example: https://www.propublica.org/article/josseli-barnica-death-miscarriage-texas-abortion-ban
What limbs and skull are you even talking about?
At that stage of pregnancy, you donât have a miniature human, it is a bunch of cells.
Also, you can also just use chemical abortion methods, where you donât physically suck of the bunch of cells.
And I really wonder, why you donât value the life of the child bearing mother.
Yeah, women are nothing but incubators anywayâŚ
And this isnât the dark age, because we now have the possibility of abortion - besides other improvements
