You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
101 points

How Europe did actually vote

Sauce Considering that Harris would more or less match renew Europe + Green + S&D, and that Trump would match the huge blue block at the right, I don’t think we’re doing much better than our American friends

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Yeah, I’m Italian and I guarantee that we would not (unfortunately) vote for Harris. We have just elected our farthest-to-the-right government ever, and far right politicians have been popular here for a few decades, now.

I really wish this graph was true, though. I need at least one reason to be proud of my country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Idk, awesome Pizza/Food in general maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I was going to sarcastically ask “ever ever?” but suspect your statement might just be literally true…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

To be fair, I was talking specifically about the Republican period (1946 and later). As much as I despise our current government, Meloni is not Mussolini yet. We’re slowly getting there, though, and I’ve never seen so many fascism sympathizers in the open (including in the government).

Our scholastic system has failed us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Also what would happen if we used the same election system where the winner is not decided by the total votes but how many districts they have the majority in and the right was manipulating the district borders in their favour

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

ow many districts they have the majority in and the right was manipulating the district borders in their favour

To be fair, it’s already an issue in some European countries, may-be not as much as the US, but I’ve seen weird electoral district in France too

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

It’s only an issue in first-past-the-post elections though, of which continental Europe has far fewer. It’s not an issue in relative elections, such as for most parliaments in continental Europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I tend to agree with you but I think most EPP voters don’t. They consider themselves moderate and would probably prefer Harris over Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Even though they claim to be moderate, pragmatic, anchored in real-life, what they vote and what they say, looks like pretty Trumpian, at least in the French political spectrum. Guess who voted against the gay-marriage ? Guess who voted against banning conversion therapies ? Guess who proposed to ban gender affirming care for minor ? Guess who wants stricter immigrations rules (without hiring civil servant and judge to apply the existing laws) Guess who goes into anti-woke rant (Actually, we can even extend to some centrists from renew, especially when crossing the belgian border , Guess who pass law to increase the weight of private insurance over public healthcare ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Considering the number of high ranking older Republicans, who support Harris, that really does not mean that much. Seriously Dick Cheney supports Harris these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

True. I suspect there are a bunch of effects that come into play because the question is basically, “What would go do if you could vote for another country?”

E.g., I am not sure whether respondents voted for the candidate they would want to live under (which I think would be the more straightforward option) vs. which candidate they would want to see in another country (for the benefit of their home country).

There’s also a strong element of how deep people are in the national/US propaganda cycle vs. hearing a few news items from a distance.

Also … The image above is of course presupposing a per-country first-past-the-post voting system. Denmark only has 4% Trump voters (which I don’t think matches with their national voting behavior). However, e.g. Germany polled at 21% Trump voters which happens to line up almost perfectly with the percentage of far-right Afd voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

happens to

lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, yeah — obviously the same people that get their news almost exclusively from “alternative” media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I am quite sure that a lot of German CDU/CSU and FDP voters would also vote Trump over Harris, if these were the two only choices for the next federal election in Germany.

What we mostly hear about them is Trump being the crazy criminal and Harris being the rational decent person. It is very detached from the policies and also we saw how the right and far right media in Germany wrecked havoc on the Green party in the 2021 pre-election time. So the way the media and people talk about them would be very different. Also we have Merz having a stable high polling at 30-35% with going the Trump route. Just that instead of eating peoples pets, immigrants are stealing dentist appointments. The CSU also copied a lot of the anti LGBT propaganda from the US Republicans, the Greens are the source of all economic problems…

We are a lot closer to electing Trump-like people than this study suggests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The problem with Trump is that he is loud and slightly crazy. That just does not work well with German post WW2 culture. If somebody calmer would run, that would be a different story though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points
*

I am pretty sure USA Democrates are closer to EU moderate right, they are not the left as we consider it in EU (except for Bernie Sanders maybe). So you should probably include those too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

To be honest most of even Bernie’s proposals are things that Europeans fought for decades ago. He’s basically a social democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yes, social democrat is where left starts in EU, I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That would be because he lives in a right wing hellscape and that’s his compromise position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve heard the epp and s&d work together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The parties that I know in the EPP (Belgian and dutch) are definitely to the left of the USA democrats, which isn’t very hard. On the national level, member parties of EPP will work and have worked together with their s&d counterparts in many countries. And in the eu parliament, s&d, renew and EPP have indeed worked together for many years.

So yeah, they definitely would not be in Trump’s camp. I don’t get how one can claim that EPP is far right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

EPP is centrist, not far right, and they work together with greens + socialists + liberals. The national parties that are members of the EPP, that I know, are the old christian democrat parties and in terms of the USA Overton window, they would be to the left of USA democratic party. The far right only has about a quarter of MEPs.

"Combined, the three political groups on the right have 187 MEPs, just over a quarter of the total, but they are viewed as unlikely to form a coherent and united bloc. Following the election, leaders of the EPP, S&D and Renew Europe groups stressed their commitment to working together as a pro-EU “democratic alliance”. The S&D and Renew Europe, together with the Greens/EFA, also stressed that they rejected cooperation with groups on the right, including the ECR. "

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10068/

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 8.6K

    Comments