You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
45 points
*

For its part, Boeing representatives announced they are “reviewing the report, which appears to be based on an inapt comparison of the prices paid for parts that meet aircraft and contract specifications and designs versus basic commercial items that would not be qualified or approved for use on the C-17,” the company said in a statement.

looks dubiously at dispenser

In what way is the right-hand soap dispenser not adequately qualified?

EDIT: It looks like the C-17 can fly pressurized, so I don’t think that it can be undergoing pressure changes, which is the one thing that I could think of.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

I’m 90% sure these deals are a way to funnel money into defense contractors without having a suspicious paper trail.

Overcharge a bit here and there, and by sheer volume you get a nice shadow budget to build and operate things that aren’t even supposed to exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Welcome to the MIC. Have a gold star and a bunch of war crimes that would make Satan question his existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

The COTS unit shown there is not tested and certified to the contract requirements Boeing was working to. Simple as. If the price ridiculous? Absolutely yes. But you cannot go to a home hardware store and slap one in a plane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

If I can slap it in a collapsible sub, I can slap it in an airplane!

Besides, it’s not like it’s supposed to be what’s holding the door plug on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Everyone single part on a plane has to be certified and from a certified supplier that goes through a stupid process to be certified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well ya can but you’re taking some risks if you do. Your soap dispenser might not work worth a shit if you haven’t tested it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And that’s how everyone got cholera

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The cabin is usually pressurized to the equivalent of 8000 ft asl. So the dispenser does have to deal with pressure changes. A simple vent hole aught to take care of that though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Also, as the safety briefing says, “we do not anticipate a change in cabin pressure,” but if a rapid decompression should occur, there was probably some provision made so that the soap dispenser doesn’t just shatter or explode or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would hate not to be able to use the dispenser if the plane lost cabin pressure… how would I ever survive dying if I had dirty hands when it happened?..

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 573

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators