You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
44 points
*

jesus fuck so many parts of this are psychic injury

the account name, the presumption of “oh yeah my opinion is right”, the very nature of this person’s “engagement” (quotes intentional) with conflict, the deference to non-authority (holy fuck how the fuck is it that we have worse than the personal-abdication of christianity (oh right, it’s mcfuckingsaltman’s fault))…

I want to say “some of these people are in desperate need of a hug”, but then as a friend of mine pointed out recently: “maybe if they weren’t all such self-loathing pieces of shit they may actually get a hug”

permalink
report
reply
11 points

jfc I just noticed the account name 🤦

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

The Dao that posts through it on Twitter is not the true dao

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

1000% chance it’s Distributed Autonomous Organization (cryptoshit) and not the one and true Way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Literally

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators