32

Are we close to gene editing where humans can detect diseases beforehand and get rid of them? If we are not what is holding us back?

posted
by
Avatar
Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
in
Avatar
askscience@lemmy.world
9 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
0 points

In the case of embryo cloning, it’s Sophie’s Choice but for embryos. Make a few dozen combinations of sperm and egg, and then choose the best one to grow based on your opinion. But embryos are people too. How many potential sibs can you waste for the perfect child? It’s icky, and we should have caution when we do powerful things.

Individual gene editing therapies are also being worked on now, but these pose similar issues.

What if taking away depression from the next few generations causes the human population to no longer produce quality artists? Another issue: the wealthy will have unequal access to it compared to others. We can only have nice things (freedom from disease) if there are those willing to pay charge for them. Not everyone can benefit from gene therapy, so it is not truly a benefit to society or humanity, and therefore should not be developed as a biotechnology. As if that ever stopped anyone.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
6 points

But embryos are people too.

Eh, they’re not people yet.

How many potential sibs can you waste for the perfect child?

Human bodies produce way more gametes than most people want children, so I’d say that one could “waste” quite a few.

Not everyone can benefit from gene therapy, so it is not truly a benefit to society or humanity, and therefore should not be developed

Strongly disagree. While socioeconomic inequality is an important issue to address, that is no reason to halt scientific research and technological progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ask Science

!askscience@lemmy.world

Create post

Ask a science question, get a science answer.

Community Rules

Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.

Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.

Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.

Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.

Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.

Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.

Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.

Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.

Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.

Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.

Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.

Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.

Rule 7: Report violations.

Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.

Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.

Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.

Rule 9: Source required for answers.

Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.

By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.

Community stats

  • 430

    Monthly active users

  • 124

    Posts

  • 968

    Comments

Community moderators