A new poll suggests that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is drawing more voters from former President Donald Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to a Noble Predictive Insights survey released last week, Harris holds a narrow lead over Trump in a hypothetical three-way race. With Stein on the ballot, Harris’ lead expands, pointing to a potential spoiler effect similar to what many Democrats blamed Stein for doing to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

For Trump, the emergence of Stein as a potential spoiler may be a critical factor in battleground states, where even a small shift in votes could determine the outcome. For Harris, Stein’s candidacy could paradoxically provide an unexpected advantage, drawing votes from Trump and narrowing his pathway to victory.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-5 points

There is no legitimate third-party candidate in a first past the post system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Of course they are

Not being likely to win doesn’t make them illegitimate.

The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

… I’m not sure how to break this to you, but the UK is a monarchy and has literally never elected their leader.

FPTP isn’t nearly as problematic in a system with distributed representation like Parliament, the Senate, or the House. It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Seek help. And an education.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

No, it’s not. That’s how all of the elections you just listed work. That’s how first past the post works.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 9K

    Comments