feddit.org

1 point

2 months ago

The Tripartite Pact was an alliance, the black fascists agreed on mutual defense terms. Molotov-Ribbentrop was painting new lines on a map and agreeing on trade and, as mentioned, literally no credible experts view it otherwise.

… would you like to mention the signatories of the Tripartite Pact for the sake of the rest of the class?

report

[ - ]

0 points

2 months ago

Germany, Italy, and Japan. Despite the name, there were several other signatories, particularly in the Balkans, as Europe began to bend the knee.

Did you think Russia signed it?

report

[ - ]

0 points

2 months ago

Did you think Russia signed it?

… do you think Finland signed it?

Jesus Christ.

I redirect you to

It would seem it has a different name when the Finns and the Nazis do it than when the Soviets and the Nazis do it.

report

[ - ]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Finland

0 points

2 months ago

Do you think you can only have one alliance?

Actual clown shit bro. Just admit they helped the Nazis and that That Was Bad Even If Not Quite As Bad As The Axis Proper.

Btw, this was your boy Ryti’s end goal from the indisputable military alliance only a fucking liar would argue wasn’t a thing with 100k-200k Nazis attacking from Finnish territory:

report

[ - ]

-1 points

2 months ago

Actual clown shit bro. Just admit they helped the Nazis and that That Was Bad Even If Not Quite As Bad As The Axis Proper.

I literally said as much in my very first comment. It’s not my fault you’re falling over yourself to bootlick Soviet tag-teaming genocide with the Nazis because, I don’t know, Finns bad or something. Apparently two things can’t be bad at once.

Finland is slightly better than the Soviet Union in that their Nazi collaboration was in response to a mass campaign of ethnic cleansing (of almost half a million Finns expelled by the Soviets after the unjustified aggression of the Winter War) rather than preceded by a mass campaign of ethnic cleansing (of Poles in the USSR by the Soviets before the joint Nazi-Soviet invasion of Poland). Both remain unconscionable.

Where the fuck is your reading comprehension?

report

[ - ]

0 points

2 months ago

Wherever you keep your intellectual honesty in this comment chain started by revisionist nationalism.

report

[ - ]

-1 points

2 months ago

Wherever you keep your intellectual honesty in this comment chain started by revisionist nationalism.

So you have no actual response to the fact that your statement of

Actual clown shit bro. Just admit they helped the Nazis and that That Was Bad Even If Not Quite As Bad As The Axis Proper.

is based off the fact that you couldn’t be arsed to read what I’ve said because you were tripping over your own shoes to deepthroat a Soviet jackboot?

“Just admit to the very first thing you said”. Fuck’s sake.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

-1 points

2 months ago

Do you think you can only have one alliance?

So you brought up the Tripartite Alliance in a discussion about Finland, contrasting the Tripartite Alliance with the accusation towards the Soviets having done the exact same thing as the Finns, in order to show…

… what, again?

The Tripartite Pact was an alliance, the black fascists agreed on mutual defense terms. Molotov-Ribbentrop was painting new lines on a map and agreeing on trade and, as mentioned, literally no credible experts view it otherwise.

report

[ - ]

0 points

2 months ago

You’re the one who falsely claimed the Soviets and Axis had an alliance. I pointed to what actual alliances are, since you seemed to be confused by the idea.

report

[ - ]

-1 points

2 months ago

What is it you would call coordinating military efforts against a common foe?

It would seem it has a different name when the Finns and the Nazis do it than when the Soviets and the Nazis do it.

report