You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
20 points
*

The question is whether this is all there is.

He originally applied for a student visa. If a judge takes this at face value and is approved, every asylum seeker will take a picture with rainbows to get approved. The judge did comment on posturing and I think is just asking “have you ever been in a same sex relationship?”. It could be that there is zero evidence of a relationship.

Being gay isn’t wearing rainbows, it’s being attracted to someone of the same sex.

Asylum cases are a little more challenging and do need more proof than other situations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

If you come from a country where homosexuals have to fear for their life, taking and publishing pictures like that puts you in mortal danger if your asylum claim is denied.
I’d say after providing these photos, it almost doesn’t matter whether you’re really gay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

So all it takes to get asylum in the country is to take a picture with a rainbow top on yeah?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

As you can plainly see by this article, no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s what I was thinking. If it’s dangerous to send back someone who is gay, then it is dangerous to send back someone who is very publicly perceived to be gay. In some ways, the publicity from this case has made his case stronger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

He’s worked for an lgbtqia+ charity for asylum seekers. At this point, I don’t care if he is gay, he deserves to be accepted on merit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If that is true, every asylum seeker would volunteer for an LGBTQIA+ charity. If it’s abused it could undermine the cases of gay people genuinely needing refuge as conversation goes from safety, to loophole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“A major part of this involves giving oral testimony to a Home Office official. Inspectors in 2013 found that one in 10 interviewers would ask LGBTQ+ asylum seekers ‘intrusive questions’ such as: ‘Did you put your penis into X’s backside?’ and ‘Did X ejaculate inside you?’“

Bruh imagine getting deported for being a Virgin, you don’t carry enough homosexual proof like wtf, like what are you even saying ? He should be gayer? Like wtf, he should be promiscuous would that “validate” him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Do you think gay people have to have sex to be discriminated against?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d say a minority of homophobes have witnessed gay sex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Ooof. That is a brutal line of questioning.

Home Office never had a good reputation with this sort of stuff. I think they were pretty thorough on visa through marriage as well due to there being many fake marriages they had to fish through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

imagine getting deported for being a Virgin,

That, as well as aro/ace being a thing, but also - imagine living someplace where being in the relationship you want to be in is not only illegal but potentially punishable by death, so you don’t risk it, or if you do, definitely don’t document it, and when you finally escape somewhere you think is safe, they tell you you don’t deserve protection because you have no proof of past relationships.

And don’t even start on the fact that much of the rampant homophobia around the world was institutionalised there by the same nations now looking for any way to turn those trying to desperately escape it, away.

Colonise the world, pillage and hoard all of the wealth and resources, then pull up the ladder and kick off anyone trying to escape the pit you put them in and whine about how they’re the ones trying to take over. It’s obscene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That, as well as aro/ace being a thing

If you’re aro /ace why exactly are you claiming asylum based on sexuality

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

"this guy’s got no street cred, fake and straight. "

permalink
report
parent
reply

UK Politics

!uk_politics@feddit.uk

Create post

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 737

    Posts

  • 4.7K

    Comments