Another angle:

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
15 points

If those numbers are correct, that’s 40x the energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

rough approximation, but I did double check the numbers.

ie we don’t know the exact weight of the bomber, but that’s its average laden weight, could be lighter without bombs

in 2001 the second plane hit faster than the first and I believe the first is guessed from footage but the second is from the black box?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

40x the kinetic energy. Now consider the chemical energy stored in sufficient fuel for a coast to coast flight of that weight and speed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

HistoryPorn

!historyporn@lemmy.world

Create post

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators’ instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

Community stats

  • 4.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 445

    Posts

  • 3.3K

    Comments

Community moderators