BRING IT ON NITPICKY NUKE NERDS

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-12 points

Criticize all you’d like. I just think it’s better to let corporations foot the research, especially if it turns out to be a fruitless attempt at progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

imagine having takes about tech

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Imagine repeatedly being critical of another’s opinion without offering a counterargument.

I’m sure you’ll develop adult conversational skills as you mature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

imagine dropping into the takes lounge for techs, and instead pouting

but also holy fuck this is the second “waaaaaaah just you wait until you grow up” we’ve had recently, wtf. are the promptfans okay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

christ alfucking mighty all your posts are this boring

and since that “counterargument” shit means you definitely didn’t read the sidebar, off you fuck, debatebro

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For the non-banned people who think this is a good take. It is not. Corps due to competing with each other keep the research private, which if it doesn’t work out will lead others to do similar research (wasting that time/money again) or they will patent it which causes a slowdown in further research due to all the license payment shit. (Or worse, they go the before patents were a thing way, and keep it all a secret, wasting more time and money).

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 324

    Posts

  • 8.7K

    Comments

Community moderators