You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
6 points
*

There are so many stories in the history of spaceflight of deployables not deploying, so it’s completely believable that they didn’t work. There are stories of astronauts kicking them, satellite operators jostling and gimbling and heating them, limited performance from partial failures…

Bigger cheaper rockets should hopefully mean less JWST Rube Goldberg style satellites because the extra volume and mass can be put to use. But it probably just means even bigger deployables…

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Imagine the luxury of launching probes that have backup antennas, and redundant instruments, power, and guidance.

Bigger rockets promise so much

permalink
report
parent
reply

Spaceflight

!spaceflight@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

Community stats

  • 464

    Monthly active users

  • 647

    Posts

  • 1.4K

    Comments