cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396569

Moira Donegan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 06.07 EDT

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
31 points

If you (or anyone else) will never change your vote about it, why would they adjust their position?

You’ve given them no downside to continuing to support genocide other than the weight of thousands of innocent dead on their consciences. It should be fairly obvious how much that affects them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Unfortunately, there is a downside to allowing Trump to win. It’s the trolly problem and yes I will help pull the lever that kills people to keep even more people from dying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Democrats already started the second genocide in Lebanon.

And soon a war with Iran.

All the “greater evils” of Trump will have been fulfilled by democrats before Trump even become president

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That is a total lie. That’s a very small segment of what Trump would do, and Trump wants to accelerate that too. He also holds a lot of anti-trans positions and anti-woman positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’s just the evil abroad. Trump welcomes evil right here at home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Then it’s not a single lever pull - it’s a sum of lever pulls over a long time period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Not everything is about Donald fucking Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Oh shit, I thought he was running for president or something

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

However the American presidential election and the consequences of it’s outcome certainly is in large part about Donald fucking Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Since when?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Following polls, they would have an upside of about a 6 point boost if they changed on policy. Which is certainly significant with the race as close as it is.

Quote

Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

Quotes

In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

Quotes

Quotes

Quotes

Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thank you for compiling this so neatly. It’s nice to have this all together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Bear in mind that I agree with you entirely.

I fear Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wish I knew what this said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you (or anyone else)

Voters are a spectrum. Some number of people in OhStepYellingAtMe’s rough demographic either started out less engaged or have a more visceral reaction and won’t vote. A reliable Democratic vote being demotivated means an unreliable vote may already be lost. Not threatening to withhold your individual vote doesn’t mean comments like this aren’t a warning sign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

A warning sign the Harris campaign has continued to ignore and done nothing to try to win back.

If they think they can win without people who won’t vote for genocide, best of luck to them, but they clearly don’t want my vote, so I see no reason why I should give it to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

people who won’t vote for genocide,

Would you prefer to vote for the candidate who has been calling for a cease fire, or the one that has bent over for Netanyahu in the past and fully plans to do it again?

Because those are the only 2 options available.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

What are we going to change our vote to? Only two parties can win this year (let’s change that) and the other option is worse on this issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ll vote for someone who is vocally and demonstrably anti-genocide. If that’s neither of the main parties’ candidates that’s their problem.

I will not vote for genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Not voting is a choice. Not voting is saying you’re okay with either option. You’re OK with fascism because you can’t bear to have neoliberalism instead. Maybe you’d rather have genocide of both Arabs and Latin Americans? Maybe you’d rather have a president who has promised to make the genocide worse than one who might put some amount of pressure to make it less bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Welcome to two party systems. The only way out is to abolish FPTP voting, the electoral college and (In the case of local/state elections) gerrymandering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

You wanna go to prison for that wrong-think. Cause that is what the other candidate is going to do. As well as provide EVEN MORE support to Israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Both parties are currently fighting each other over who can say they support Israel more right now. They’re both falling over each other to do more genocide. I’m not voting for a candidate that supports genocide. I’m especially not voting for a candidate who thinks doubling down on doing genocide is going to get them more votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

One party has actual muslims in it’s caucus. the other party is obviously in the bag for Bibi.

I call bullshit, you were either never going to vote or never going to vote dem either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments