You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-12 points

I don’t agree with it but it’s worth reading. The crux of the argument is this:

Consider this: In 2016, Hillary Clinton famously won the nationwide popular vote by nearly 3 million votes, but lost the election to Donald Trump in the Electoral College, doing much to enflame American progressives’ distaste for the college. What’s worth noting is that Clinton’s popular vote margin that year within the borders of California was well over 4 million votes. In short, outside California, Trump won the popular vote across 49 states.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I don’t know if that makes any kind of point. Republicans don’t win national majorities. It’s not relevant which parcels of land they live on - land doesn’t vote (at least at the present, I’m sure someone at the heritage foundation is working on it)

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Yeah, it turns out that changing the data changes the results 🙄

Since we’re just doing random shit and seeing what it looks like, how much did she win by if we remove Texas?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, I misread the argument and thought it was saying something more interesting 🤦 It’s actually a silly argument and now I regret posting the article, but at least there was some good discussion of how bad it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

So they’re argument is that Californians are worth less than the rest of America? Glad our votes here are worth less than one to them :/

permalink
report
parent
reply

Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro

!msp@midwest.social

Create post

About

A community for leftists and progressives within the Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro Area, including all suburbs and exurbs.

Community banner courtesy of @maven@lemmy.zip ❤️

Guidelines

  1. Be nice

  2. Comment substantively

  3. Probably some other stuff

Community stats

  • 160

    Monthly active users

  • 223

    Posts

  • 325

    Comments