You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
55 points
*

This is exactly why we need ranked choice voting.

Winner takes all essentially demoralizes and alienates voters and drives people who agree with each other to fight because they’re trapped in a broken system.

So instead of fighting the system, it’s easier to just blame other people and alienate more of them against your cause, shooting yourself in the foot with ignorance. It’s kind of disgusting.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I’d settle for getting rid of the electoral college at this point. We could’ve had at least 4 years of Al Gore setting us on the right path to avoiding the worst of climate change yet here we are having to put up with a potentially third popular vote upset in recent history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ranked choice is more plausible than removing the EC. Ranked choice already exists in some places and the Dems have a proposal (but are lacking the votes) to implement it for Congress.

Removing the EC would require a constitutional amendment so 3/4 for the House and Senate and ratified by 3/4 of the states. Or maybe it’s 2/3 for some of those, but either way it needs bipartisan support and why would the GOP remove a system that got their guy elected twice this century?

There is some kind of interstate compact thing to get around it, but making a huge change to elections via sneaky shenanigans won’t go over well at a time when a lot of doubts about election integrity have been widely promoted. Wrongly promoted, but still, doing sneaky things about elections is a real no-go right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why is it so common to blame the third party vote for democrats losing in 2016? It sounds like if the democrats would take an anti-war stance like the green party does, they would have won most of those votes too?

Seems more appropriate to expect the party to reflect the population rather than the other way around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s the Schrodinger’s Tankies. Simultaneously so insignificant as a voting block that it’s a waste of time to appeal to them, and so influential that it’s exclusively their fault when the dems lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Wasn’t Green Party seen sitting at a table with Putin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Al gore won that election

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Why not both?

(Oh yeah, the fundamentally corrupt and undemocratic system concocted by literal slave masters.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How would we get ranked choice passed using the current two party system though? I can’t imagine politicians voting to give up power in that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Maine has, and Alaska too. Although Alaska is trying to repeal it this election cycle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How would that contribute towards changing the policy federally?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 8.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 63K

    Comments