Found this blog post and found it had more insight into the issues around the dev and the toxicity in FOSS

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
33 points

There have been many improvements in making documentation more inclusive across the IT industry which shouldn’t be scoffed at. The first that comes to mind is changing “master” and “slave” to “primary” and “secondary” (or “replica” etc.) because references to slavery is inconsiderate to many.

I don’t think pile-ons are productive, but I think inclusive language and thinking is important.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

You must construct additional pile-ons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
3 points
7 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How about when there are folks who have been harmed by people with agendas?

They’d prefer their code or commentary to be inclusive, not exclusive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make

permalink
report
parent
reply

Free and Open Source Software

!foss@beehaw.org

Create post

If it’s free and open source and it’s also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 730

    Monthly active users

  • 474

    Posts

  • 2.7K

    Comments