Anon's coworker is a flat-earther(sh.itjust.works)

posted 6 months ago

🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM

greentext@sh.itjust.works

135 commentshide report

Sort:

Hot Top Controversial New Old

You are viewing a single thread.

View all comments

[ - ]

rainynight65@feddit.de

89 points

6 months ago

The problem is that flat-earthers aren’t just that. They usually believe in all kinds of other kooky stuff as well, and some of those beliefs pose an active danger to society.

permalink

report

[ - ]

Pegajace@lemmy.world

22 points

6 months ago

Exactly, the same mindset that takes you to “The entire geophysical establishment is wrong/lying about the shape of the Earth, so I’ll listen to this Youtube crank who says it’s a disc instead” will also lead you to things like “The entire medical establishment is wrong/lying about the effectiveness of masks & vaccines, so I’ll listen to this podcast crank hawking horse dewormer instead.”

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

atomicorange@lemmy.world

5 points

6 months ago

There’s always an implied “them” hiding the conspiracy as well. It’s just a couple of short steps from flat earth to “jews will not replace us”.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

bitchkat@lemmy.world

0 points

6 months ago

Don’t need a podcast when the president at the time was telling them to take the horse dewormer.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

0 points

6 months ago

To be fair, the medical establishment did lie about it, but not because of some weird “big mask” or “big pharma” conspiracy, but because they have a tangible impact when used by large groups and overselling them would have better outcomes than underselling them.

It’s a classic problem those in power have to deal with: tell the truth and get an underwhelming response, or oversell and get a better response.

Don’t take horse dewormers though, that’s just dumb.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

rainynight65@feddit.de

0 points

6 months ago

Overselling something that is true is not the same as flat out lying about the efficacy of a random pharmaceutical. Not even in the same neighbourhood.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

1 point

6 months ago

You can surely at least understand the mindset there. Basically, when party A is obviously lying, a party B that calls them out appears more trustworthy, and it’s easier to overlook the obvious flaws in party B’s alternative. Here’s the logic, specific to vaccines:

group A claims vaccines are effective against contracting a given disease
group B points to evidence of actual effectiveness, which vastly falls short of what the public thinks
group B proposes an alternative to the vaccine, implying it’s effective and that group A doesn’t want others to know about it
group A attacks group B’s alternative

This creates an us vs them situation, so if you already distrust group A somewhat, it’s easy to side w/ group B, assuming you have no actual knowledge to parse the available information. The same logic works with anything, you just need a little bit of distrust w/ some authority, evidence of false/misleading statements, and a seemingly credible alternative.

The trick is to not lie/be misleading in the first place so you don’t break the trust. Trust takes years to build and a moment to break, so you need a very good reason to break the trust.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

rainynight65@feddit.de

1 point

6 months ago

No, I really can’t understand the mindset. Especially not in the face of the constant undermining of trust by certain elements of society, including when they’re in government. We didn’t just arrive here for no reason. The same people who have eroded the trustworthiness of government and authority (on purpose, see Reagan) over decades are the ones who now exploit the results of their actions, for their own gain.

If, in your scenario, group B was on the level, it would be a different story. But they aren’t. If A oversold their claim, B would have massively oversold theirs. And that was easy to prove and has been proven. B also just didn’t oversell their own claim, they also exaggerated the claim that they refuted to something that, in this form, was never said - standard MO.

There is no trick to this. Being factual and getting people to believe you is much harder than telling an easy but good-sounding lie and getting people to believ you.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

1 point

6 months ago

If A oversold their claim, B would have massively oversold theirs. And that was easy to prove and has been proven

Right. But if A is supposed to be the trusted authority and B proves they aren’t trustworthy, you’re more likely to not believe criticisms of B because “the establishment” has already been proven untrustworthy. That’s how conspiracies gain traction, and any amount of hiding of information gives fuel to detractors.

So people are going to ignore criticism of B because they’ll feel that B is the “underdog” being attacked by “the establishment.” That’s how these things work.

There is no trick to this. Being factual and getting people to believe you is much harder than telling an easy but good-sounding lie and getting people to believ you.

Sure, but trust is earned. You can’t lie 5% of the time and expect people to believe everything you say, if they find out about that 5%, the other 95% will be called into question. So you need to reserve the lies for when they really count.

Lying will work in the short-term, but it has big consequences in the long-term, so if you’re a long-term entity (e.g. the CDC, FBI, etc), you need to be very careful about how people interpret your message.

report

[ - ]

4 points

6 months ago

Yup, the root of flat earth conspiracy y theories is that some group is fooling everyone to enrich themselves. If you keep scratching through the layers it’s always jews that are behind it.

It’s just antisemitism cloaked in a ridiculous conspiracy.

permalink

report

parent

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

6.8K
Monthly active users
1.1K
Posts
27K
Comments

Community moderators

🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.works