Here are the top few questions, and the responses:
Kismetatron
Hi Jill, thanks for doing this AMA. I have so many questions but first can you address this statement?
“We are not in a position to win the White House. But we do have a real opportunity to win something historic. We could deny Kamala Harris the state of MI. And the polls show that most likely Harris cannot win the election without MI.”
I mean it really, really sounds like your true intent is to get Trump into the White House. Which is weird because I thought the Green Party was for climate action and saving the the environment. Silly me.
Quick question, if you do succeed how do I look my legal immigrant wife in the eyes and tell her she may deported back to her home country simply for being the wrong skin color? Trump guaranteed that this is gonna happen if gets back in office so I really want to hear the mental gymnastics behind why you would cheerlead for this kind of misery.
JillSteinOnReddit
(no response)
LizukaWest
If the intention of the Green Party is in fact to actually be a viable third party, then why is there virtually no effort made at growing power at levels below the presidency? There has not been an elected Green member of the House in years, there are only four mayors in the entire country and there are barely any city or student council members. Wouldn’t focusing on lower stakes, winnable races be ultimately more efficient than doing nothing but running doomed campaigns?
JillSteinOnReddit
Hi Lizuka, the vast majority of Green campaigns are down-ballot campaigns, mostly on the local level. Greens have won over 1500 elections, making the Green Party the most successful independent party in the country that doesn’t take corporate money.
Ballot access rules designed by the duopoly require the Green Party to run for president and other high offices - or lose ballot lines and the ability to run at all levels.
Roughly 60% of US voters believe the 2-party system doesn’t represent us and we need a new party. We don’t have a democracy unless voters have a right to choose at all levels of government.
AsherGray
How many of the 1,500 elections won were in the last decade? I’ve noticed that the green party has zero seats in the senate, zero seats in the house of Representatives, zero state governorships, 0 out of 1,972 seats in state upper chambers, 0 out of 5,411 state lower chambers, and the list goes on.
Why should the American people vote for the candidate of a party that is incompetent at getting elected to smaller divisions of government?
JillSteinOnReddit
(no response)
forgedbygeeks
What did you discuss with Putin and Flynn at the infamous Moscow dinner photo?
TeamJillStein
Jill has answered this before! Here is a link to her answer on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@drjillstein/video/7342590195394546987
Jan_17_2016
Yes, she just so happened to get invited to attend the 10th anniversary of a Russian propaganda network, and just so happened to get put at Putin’s table with Michael Flynn, just before she just so happened to siphon enough votes away from Clinton to allow for a Trump victory.
Sure, Jill.
TeamJillStein
(no response)
My coworker told me I “seem like a Jill Stein voter” the other day as a compliment. I sent him this AMA after explaining exactly why that’s not a compliment. I don’t think he knew much about her except that something called the Green Party sounds really great and progressive, right? Except Jill Stein is a fucking shill who has no interest in making this country better for anyone but herself and the people who pay her to be a spoiler.
This is how I felt when people that never cared about politics started being interested in Yang. It was impossibly difficult to not judge them too harshly (and honestly to not take it personally when they couldn’t be convinced he was just a selfish grifter)
yang strikes me as opportunistically trying to attain polyical power, but not a grifter (at least in the way alex jones or any of a thousand right-wing pundits are grifters)
Edit: Santa is a robot moderator I made for this community. That is necessary context for this comment, clearly.
Santa removed this comment, because you don’t have a lot of recent participation, and you have some heavily downvoted comments. This is what I’ve been calling the “grey area,” where Santa will judge accounts that it can’t confidently assign scores to extra harshly, in order to protect against throwaway trolls. A couple dozen downvotes can put you into a category where your comments will be removed until you’ve built up a solid track record of comments that gather more of a normal or neutral reaction.
Looking over your history, that’s clearly the wrong call. You don’t have a ton of participation or upvotes, but you have a little collection of both. Definitely enough that a couple of comments that accrued some downvotes shouldn’t exclude you from participating.
I restored the comment, and made Santa less aggressive about sniping comments from users in the grey area in the future. I’m still tweaking this part of the functionality, since it’s hard to test in the abstract, and it only comes up a couple of times a month. Carry on. You’re fine.
How does that take into account users from instances that don’t support downvotes? Also I get drunk and say dumb shit so I’ve probably got some weird swings between upvoted and downvoted posts, so I’m really just posting so you can have another data point.
Without context, this reads like a really confusing villain’s monologue. Mostly because you’re defying Santa and somehow defeated him.
