1.1K

The value of x(sh.itjust.works)

posted
by
Avatar
Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works
in
Avatar
whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
138 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Denjin@lemmings.world
8 points
*

The internal angles of a triangle always add up to 180⁰, therefore the one pixel offset is irrelevant because the unlabelled angle is, despite what the image suggests, 60 80⁰.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
4 points

Assuming you’re talking about the triangle on the left, it’s 80⁰: 180 - 60 - 40 = 80. The other two unlabeled angles are 100⁰ and 45⁰ respectively. None of the unlabelled angles are 60⁰.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
jj4211@lemmy.world
2 points

The shape on the left might be a quadrilateral instead of a triangle, with a vertex at the same place as the top vertex of the shape on the right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Denjin@lemmings.world
1 point

Yes I meant 80 lol, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
yannic@lemmy.ca
2 points

It’s enough to say it’s “CLEARLY” not 90⁰.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 7.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 813

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments

Community moderators