You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
31 points

STAR vote to make parties irrelevant except at the coalition building level!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

STAR is good for the existence of ideas but not for actually getting third party candidates elected. It stands for Score Then Automatic Run off. The top two candidates advance to the Automatic Run off. That’s just the FPTP with a dressing that makes third party voters feel better.

RCP actually empowers third party voters, is easy to understand, and is already being adopted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Finally, yes! Anyone who wants to vote for a third party should instead spend their time and effort fighting for a different voting system (ranked choice, star, etc) that could mathematically allow a third party to actually succeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

A group here in the Midwest tried. The duopoly collaborated to squash the effort. We need a third party to make it happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The problem is that there simply can’t be a third party. In our current system a third party is mathematically impossible. I would love for a majority of citizens to suddenly throw caution to the wind magically surge a third party into power. But it’s just not realistic. Again, the most a third party can do is cause a scare, but it’ll never come into power.

Also for what it’s worth there is an RCV bill for federal congressional elections in the House, which I think has a much better chance of passing than a similar bill in a deeply rural state like Missouri. Once established at a federal level I think it would simply be a matter of time until it made it’s way to even resistant states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In some perspectives, fighting for third parties does fight for a different voting system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It does, but it’s just a big gamble. You’re attempting to scare one of the establishment parties into changing by causing them to lose an election heavily. So, if it works, you’ve necessarily made a material sacrifice in giving control of an office to the opposing party, allowing them to cause whatever real world damage they are capable of causing in that position. Then you have to hope that the message is received and that the party you spoiled actually changes in the way you want, and doesn’t just ignore you. And you also have to hope that they recognize and change quickly or else the damage compounds as more elections pass.

On top of that, this only works “once”. If the party starts ignoring you again you have to make these real consequential sacrifices again.

In conclusion, with voting third party the sacrifice is guaranteed, the reward is not.

I will admit it’s possible that spoiling/scaring is the only way to get RCV (or better) in the first place since the only group it’s not good for is sitting politicians, but I’m not convinced yet.

But I’m entirely convinced that without an improved voting system we don’t actually have a democracy.

And for anyone who’s reading this, if you’re a Missourian vote NO on Amendment 7!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“Fighting for” is leaving a lot up for interpretation here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re right. In another reply I said that voting third party might move the needle for RCV, but it’s iffy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 61K

    Comments