You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
22 points

amyloid plaque crowd: UwUpsie! :blush:

permalink
report
reply
17 points

It was absolutely worth the money ruling it out. That’s literally how science works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Except the original study wasn’t properly vetted for decades and it really set us back because we blindly followed the wrong path. Science institutions failed this time around. In this case, the money was more of a tragic loss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeeeeaaaaahhhh. False evidence there, and the amount of money lost on it is possibly in the Trillions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean, the plaque might still have an effect; it’s possible that exposure to the viruses described in the article could lead to higher levels of amyloid beta plaque, or cause the plaque to be more harmful. Kinda like how a broken leg might be caused by a fall, but the actual problem wasn’t the fall, it’s the fact your leg is broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sure. It might. But no other opposing views were explored. Suggesting anything other than an amyloid plaque targeted drug ended careers.

That’s not okay.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 517

    Posts

  • 3.8K

    Comments