But you can run it on your PC using a lightweight QASM simulator.
Why depend on popularity to make it open source? Shouldn’t it be the other way?
Random take, am not trying to defend it, just thinking of reasons - maybe he doesn’t want people to fork it and risk that someone would market it better than him, and he would end up only as a footnote in sources list? So he wants to get known as The author, before making it open source?
A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.
Title and associated content has to be in English.
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
458
Monthly active users
92
Posts
76
Comments
