I was gonna include a third option about how money is easier to achieve without considering the morality of your actions but that’s not really a philosophy as much as it is an objective fact.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

I would say “meaningful”. Billionaires can have a very noticeable effect with their philanthropy, while making essentially no sacrifice on their part. The Gates Foundation does very noticeable good, but Bill Gates isn’t giving of himself very much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yup.

OPs point stands, though, because we could still do that without Gates, and for every Gates there’s a Musk that does evil and a ton of Arnaults and Bezos’s that just spend it on whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So what exactly would you propose he should do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You invite my “billionaires shouldn’t exist” TED talk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So what exactly would you propose he would do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Their harm is hidden and any benefits sung from the roof tops.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 55K

    Comments