You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

@dgerard

I had a bit making an exception for the value of “fine art” because that can get weird, like “unmade bed with a bunch of trash around it” or a signed urinal.

But I seem to have left that part on the cutting room floor.

If a piece of purely prompt-generated AI art hits a price like a shark in formaldehyde I strongly suspect it’ll be some kind of inorganic AI industry insider self-dealing to hype up the AI art market, similar to the big Beeple NFT sale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Okay but the shark in formaldehyde is fucking awesome to see in person.

It’s a shark! In formaldehyde!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

yeah, Hirst can be a bit of a hack and the names of the pieces are super cheugy but he’s definitely made some really evocative stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@V0ldek

Yeah I’m not dismissing that. It’s a big ass shark in a tank.

Or the guy who made a cast of his own head using his own frozen blood, that’s kept in a special refrigerated display case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think it might be worth reflecting on exactly why Fountain seems to “get weird;” it had a context and complaints about it are part of that context. I liked this recent video which explores the politics of Fountain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@corbin

I just mean “weird” in terms of “valued far higher than the average person might expect” but I’m not implying that that value isn’t merited. I’m not one to dismiss a Rothko.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators