You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
27 points

And it’s my view that we are free to dunk on people with bad views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

i don’t get why sane people would rather a person with good opinions over a free independent web browser, the latter just seems so much more valuable to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

@Jumuta@sh.itjust.works

@Gargari@lemmy.ml @Solumbran@lemmy.world @DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube

This is sorta a hornets nest. On the one hand I get that when it comes to tech who cares about the persons personal life but on the other hand when it comes to free software there is a concern over the orgs or individuals that run them given the trust involved. Yes you can rely on the many eyes but you want to be confident of the org (or individual) to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So you think you can draw a connection between someone’s views on inclusive language and whether an individual or org can be trusted with software security.

I’m sorry but to me this line of thinking is bonkers. The two things have nothing to do with each other whatsoever. What if a conservative individual argued that they have trust issues with an open source project because it features inclusive language now? The person might argue that they don’t understand why devs would devote their limited time to such cosmetics instead of focusing on code quality. How would you view this argument? On Lemmy it would probably be ridiculed, and rightfully so. Yet it’s the same line of thinking that I see if I interpreted your comment correctly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

What, you only use software of honest and upstanding people? Cars too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s true and I’d probably not use the software myself if the dev was someone known for stealing credentials or something, but honestly I don’t really see how someone viewing the use of “they” over “he” as political propaganda could affect the browser they’re making negatively in a substantial way.

I guess you could say that there is a possibility that he’s saying that out of homophobia and when ladybird becomes as influential as google they could do some homophobic things? I really doubt that’d be allowed by governments though

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Or you could be an adult and move on with your life. Shaming people for not sharing your groupthink ideology is such a strange way to spend your limited time on this earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Shaming people for not sharing your groupthink ideology is such a strange way to spend your limited time on this earth.

He said with no sense of irony.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

It’s almost as if there is no irony.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I only trust the people that don’t comment, because they know it’s not worth their time.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 6.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 21K

    Comments