51

Are modern LLMs closer to AGI or next word predictor? Where do they fall in this graph with 10 on x-axis being human intelligence.(programming.dev)

posted
by
Avatar
Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev
in
Avatar
asklemmy@lemmy.ml
109 comments
hidereport

Wondering if Modern LLMs like GPT4, Claude Sonnet and llama 3 are closer to human intelligence or next word predictor. Also not sure if this graph is right way to visualize it.

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
hotatenobatayaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
5 points

You’re trying to graph something that you can’t quantify.

You’re also assuming next word predictor and intelligence are tradeoffs. They could as well be the same.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
2 points

I agree, people who think LLMs are intelligent are as smart as phone keyboard autocomplete

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
1 point

I took this as a way of measuring human opinions. Like when they ask you how much it hurts on a scale of 1 to 10.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 72K

    Comments

Community moderators