Wondering if Modern LLMs like GPT4, Claude Sonnet and llama 3 are closer to human intelligence or next word predictor. Also not sure if this graph is right way to visualize it.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Human intelligence created language. We taught it to ourselves. That’s a higher order of intelligence than a next word predictor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, to the same degree we created hands. In either case it’s naturally occurring as a consequence of our evolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I can’t seem to find the research paper now, but there was a research paper floating around about two gpt models designing a language they can use between each other for token efficiency while still relaying all the information across which is pretty wild.

Not sure if it was peer reviewed though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s like looking at the “who came first, the chicken or the egg” question as a serious question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Eggs existed long before chickens evolved.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3K

    Posts

  • 51K

    Comments