51

Are modern LLMs closer to AGI or next word predictor? Where do they fall in this graph with 10 on x-axis being human intelligence.(programming.dev)

posted
by
Avatar
Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev
in
Avatar
asklemmy@lemmy.ml
109 comments
hidereport

Wondering if Modern LLMs like GPT4, Claude Sonnet and llama 3 are closer to human intelligence or next word predictor. Also not sure if this graph is right way to visualize it.

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
4 points

They’re not incompatible, although I think it unlikely AGI will be an LLM. They are all next word predictors, incredibly complex ones, but that doesn’t mean they’re not intelligent. Just as your brain is just a bunch of neurons sending signals to each other, but it’s still (presumably) intelligent.

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 72K

    Comments

Community moderators