You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
86 points
24 points

These can’t be real, they read like they were generated by an AI prompt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

No, that’s the pal-world-monster arts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Palworld monsters are not AI generated. The artist would very much like to stop being compared to an AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Those are just abstract if I’m not mistaken. There should be more detailed specifications.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Well, it makes me think that AI training was probably biased towards legal drivel like this, since it’s public facing, professional and likely even translated in multiple languages.

The student got so good that people think the teacher is imitating it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points
*

Half of those patents read like if they use vague enough language they can justify patenting how computers work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Welcome to Software Patents 101.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

How can they let companies file such broad, vague patents for mechanics that have existed since forever? For example, 20240286040, is just what flying mounts have done in WoW since 2007 or even the flying cap in Mario 64 ffs. There are probably other earlier examples, but it goes to show that it’s just noise to monopolize innovation and scare other devs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Long story short, the claims get much longer and restrictive through the application process. The example you asked about is currently undergoing a non-final rejection, and the claims will get much more restrictive in further iterations (assuming that the application has actual merit somewhere in the original dependent claims)

You can check the application history here: Global Dossier

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

My guess is the “Pokemon Box Storage” system since palworld stores pals in a palbox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Is that the wrong link? This seems totally unrelated to Pokemon in boxes, and is more about multi console character storage systems. This patent just sounds like someone described steam cloud saves in way too many big words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

In the “other references” they link to the bulbapedia article for Pokemon box so I figured thats what the whole thing was about, but yeah it does read like accessing data on a server

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Nintendo patents video game inventory system.

Not the onion.

(Not a patent lawyer, and I’m sure it’s more complicated than that, but come on)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m sorry who in their right mind signed off on this patent

NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN GAME PROGRAM, GAME SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD

Thats literally any online game server

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think that’s setting the context for the claims they make, not a claim in itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Since this was filed in Japan, it would have to be patents Nintendo own in Japan that are infringed and those don’t necessarily perfectly match those in the US

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments