You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

Scientists: weird, we didn’t slip this piece of paper saying “mansplain the chinese room thought experiment” through the door, and yet that’s all the room seems to want to do. I guess we just have to conclude the room is an idiot?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

what an unnecessarily aggressive comment. mansplain? am i even responding to a woman? also i wasn’t trying to explain it; i was saying the central question doesn’t have to involve a specific language at all and it still a worthy question, especially with all this AI bullshit being pushed all over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

mansplain? am i even responding to a woman?

christ

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

the brave pyre, of lemmy dot whirled, researching whole new levels of replyguy

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Enter these into your data banks, you automaton:

  • The chinese room was brought up as a tangent to a tangent, why are you doubling down on mansplaining it?
  • nobody was even talking about whether or not it is a good or bad concept, we were just talking about the problematic dude that made it popular
  • you are in a space that is critical of AI. The chinese room was brought up by name. You think we don’t know what it is and that you need to explain it?
  • literally all you had to do to seem even remotely reasonable was to not try mansplain AGAIN and yet you did. I wrote what I said as a joke and you went ahead and turned it into prophecy. You buffoon!!!
permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators