You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
16 points

What do you mean? This analogy doesn’t make sense for whats happening here.

He’s trying to avoid crap like SwanStation

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

What’s the problem with SwanStation? Forks are perfectly okay and normal with the GPL, that’s the fucking point of the GPL.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s exactly why they’re changing the license. The problem with Swanstation are the developers. Retroarch in general has some pretty horrible people maintaining it and this isn’t the first time they’ve harassed an emulator dev over nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And “it is already out there so they can’t take it away”:

swanstation is already a few versions back feature wise? But, regardless, it will rapidly become outdated as new “tech” is added to emulation and issues are found with third party libraries or code. Good software needs good support and just having a ten year old hash is almost always worse than useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Even if he shuts down the emulator, the code is out there forever. He will be playing whackamole with forks and various other projects just like Nintendo does. The analogy absolutely works for what’s happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply

RetroGaming

!retrogaming@lemmy.world

Create post

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 9.1K

    Comments