More than a dozen former Ronald Reagan staff members have joined dozens of other Republican figures endorsing the Democratic nominee and vice-president, Kamala Harris, saying their support was “less about supporting the Democratic party and more about our resounding support for democracy”.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Who said Liberals were cheering? This is aimed at disenfranchised conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Do you think conservatives read The Guardian? This is for internal consumption, to make liberals think “wow even Reaganites are on our side, we must be doing something right!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

So you’re critical of The Guardian then? Do you believe they should have left that story out based on their reader demographic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No? I’m critical of Harris accepting the endorsement of ghouls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No one said that. maybe they should have been crtitical of her not disavoying it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

The Guardian is a newspaper. They are just covering the news.

Other outlets are covering this also, including conservative ones.

You are way too eager to find a conspiracy here… I promise you, this British newspaper isn’t run by and for American Democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

no one is saying that is, but what queermunist is doing that you are failing to do is annilise the bias of the source, and consider the reasons for why they wrote something and the way they wrote it … this is basic media literacy

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s no conspiracy? This is just liberals telling other liberals about the “good news”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The liberals cheering is what told me the liberals where cheering. I mean … Haris even gloated that Ronald Reagon himself would vote for her.

as for disenfranchised conservitives, this is a group that does not exist, like both halvs of the uniparty pander to the conservitive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“disenfranchised conservatives” he says

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I live in NY. It’s a blue state with ~3M Republicans. Most of the ones I know are only in it for financial reasons (large portfolios, business owners, etc.). They voted for Trump in his first term, and are very reluctant to vote for him again. There are more of them than you think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

that is not what “disenfranchised” means at all. These people are business owners with large portfolios?? They are objectively some of the most enfranchised people in the country. They’re literally sitting on their thumbs in their bathtubs of money deciding which genocidaire would be better for their wallets? How is this a disenfranchised population? This is objectively the opposite. Fuck them.

Anyone catering to these very enfranchised sociopaths for votes, rather than to (and while actively repressing and brow-beating) those who are demanding an end to the bipartisan US-financed and US-armed genocide in Palestine, and rather than to the huge portion of actual left-wing voters and poor working class voters who are moving to 3rd parties or among the 35-50% who have stopped voting because of how actually disenfranchised and abandoned by this imperialist-corporate-conglomerate pretending to be two different parties they are — anyone catering to the former group instead of the latter two groups is my enemy

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments