How do you guys get software that is not in your distribution’s repositories?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
75 points

There is no software that is not in AUR. I use arch, BTW.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

But yeah, sometimes I just compile from source, if needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Indeed, but don’t underestimate my laziness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

My software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I guess we should have added the word “notable”

I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;)

I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Ouch. xD

It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?

The appimage is basically just git clone -> make -> make install DESTDIR=/path/to/AppDir -> wget appimagecreationtool and finally appimagecreationtool /path/to/AppDir and that’s it you have your appimage.

appimagecreationtool being several tools that can create the appimage from an AppDir, like linuxdeploy, linuxdeploqt, go-appimage, etc

And that on itself isn’t complex either, it if basically running ldd on the binary, then copy those libraries into the AppDir and finally run patchelf to patch the paths in the binaries and libraries, suyu uses a deploy script instead of using those tools, which I’ve recently forked and began expanding.

I don’t know how easy it is to make a flatpak or snap, but I do know the dev of zen browser hates dealing with the flatpak and iirc right now the flatpak is outdated as result.

EDIT: Also lite-xl has been making a flatpak for like 2 years and it isn’t ready yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There’s so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i use arch based btw (I love my Manjaro and it’s AUR support) :>

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Gatekeeping the word “software” here?
Here’s something not in the AUR. Tested on arch

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Clearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35

Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it’s in the AUR. No exceptions.

Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I don’t intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It’s not worth it.
Maybe I’ll make an AppImage at most.

I don’t know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

This is such a weird gatekeeper take

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 910

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments