Hi ! I’m a little confuse between all immutable versions based on fedora. Is this correct : universal blue = tool to create image, based on fedora atomic desktop ?
With universal blue, they created :
- Bluefin = gnome
- Bluefin-DX = gnome + developper tools
- Aurora = kde
- Aurora-DX = kde + developper tools
- Bazzite = games
What the difference between silverble and bluefin for example, and which are you using ?
is lead by a single person
Ultimately, (some) decisions are made by a single person. However, the list of maintainers suggests that contributions are welcome.
> even though there is no evidence that Chromium is not even less secure)
The double negation makes it hard to understand; but if I would give it a try, then I would get the following:
“even though there is evidence that Chromium is even less secure)”
If the above represents your views, could you provide said evidence?
even though there is no evidence that Chromium is not even less secure
What’s your take on Madaidan’s (i.e. security researcher on projects like Kicksecure and Whonix) article on the matter? I’m aware that it’s a bit outdated. However, would you be able to confidently claim that nothing found within is relevant today?
The article is very outdated and possibly not complete. ChromeOS uses Linux so you can assume it is very secure there.
I miss a debunk on the exact points by firefox devs.
But people everywhere told me madaidans article is not correct. Torbrowser also still doesnt use Chromium for various reasons. And that is the most security critical browser there is.
The article is very outdated and possibly not complete.
Source to back this up?
ChromeOS uses Linux so you can assume it is very secure there.
Wut? I didn’t get this. Could you elaborate?
I miss a debunk on the exact points by firefox devs.
Does such a debunk even exist? Or do you hope it will be made at some point? Furthermore, do you imply that it deserves a debunk; hence its content is false? If so, based on what?
But people everywhere told me madaidans article is not correct.
Have they offered you a similarly well-backed and sourced refutation/article? Or did you simply dismiss Madaidan’s cited claims without anything to back it up? Do you think this is an academic/logical/sensible approach just because some randos said it’s incorrect?
Torbrowser also still doesnt use Chromium for various reasons. And that is the most security critical browser there is.
Tor Browser’s commitment to Firefox is probably more related to sunk cost fallacy, FOSS and trust than it’s to Firefox’ merits on security.
Please just duckduckgo these questions.
The article is from an old date and got no updates, security is a moving target so it is outdated.
a debunk is not existent, thats why I miss it.
I requested such an article of Mozilla devs long ago. There is a damn bugzilla thread, which helps a bit, but it needs developer documentation or something.
Torbrowser needs to be secure. If the browser source cannot be trusted, or if Mozilla can be trusted more, then it makes sense to use it.
“even though there is evidence that Chromium is even less secure)”
That’s not how double negatives work. The alternative would be:
Even though there’s no evidence that chromium is more secure.
