This bot is spreading misinformation.

This bot is spreading rightwing propaganda.

This bot is spamming every post.

This bot is consistently downvoted.

This bot degrades the user experience.

Please ban it.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-5 points
*

it explicitly addresses the baseless accusations of internal bias impacting ratings.

that’s the very point of these independent studies.

if mbfc checkers or other fact-checkers allowed their biases into their ratings, those findings would differ from other news fact-checking sources that managed to rate news sources more objectively.

since their findings range from very similar to nearly identical to other credible news fact-checking sources and importantly there is still zero evidence of their “own bias” affecting their ratings, there’s no base for the accusations.

just rilers rilin’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They ignored the part of

MBFC Credibility Rating:

Which is where the founder loves to play around with ratings based on their own biases.

The study you linked too goes off of the factual rating which the founder usually doesn’t touch.

It’s amazing how many they will say factual no failed fact checks then immediately doc rating because of their bias. Especially if publication doesn’t like Israel

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy.world Support

!support@lemmy.world

Create post

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world



Community stats

  • 147

    Monthly active users

  • 155

    Posts

  • 654

    Comments