You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

Sad story. Best OS I ever run was around 2002 NetBSD on a desktop. It is quite bad that Linux is the only viable player for an operating system on desktops/laptops. (With viable I mean has drivers for all of my my hardware and runs the software I need for personal and professional life.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s amazing. No fragmentation means more standardization. And Linux is Open Source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not really true. Without some fragmentation there is no need for standards

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Linux already has a ton of distros. Supporting an entirely different OS is far more of a hassle for developers than releasing a deb snap or flatpak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

With the same logic, Microsoft’s dominance also helps the user in not having to choose between multiple types of systems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

If Windows was free and open source you wouldn’t hear me complaining.

The reason Windows is so dominant to begin with is because they standardized stuff and people didn’t have to open a terminal because of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

According to your logic we should all use Google Chrome. ;-)

Comparing Linux with the BSDs is really apples and oranges. The BSDs have a very nicely integrated base system, everything just works™ and everything works together. When you only ever used Linux or Apple with homebrew, you never experienced a system where all basic tools really fit and work together.

Linux is a pragmatic choice, but it is an Unix-clone made by PC people. The BSDs are a Unix operating system for PCs made by Unix people. We loose something very important if the BSDs get totally out of style/forgotten.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You make a very good point about Chrome. If Google was not the lord of development I might actually have nodded along with that as well.

My BSD experience comes from Truenas core which did not play nice with docker and needed a ton of custom work with jails. They have since moved to Linux with scale and suddenly everything integrates a lot more nicely.

Though there are multiple Linux versions as well maintained by different companies. But the altruistic dictator still plays a key role. I’m not sure what my opinion is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Redox looks like it’s up and coming, hopefully something useable pans out from it once cosmic is rolled out of alpha.

Microkernel is an uptime and security benefit on modern hardware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would be happy if something usable comes out of it. OTOH, the classical problem is and has always been driver support. I am not sure I like the plan of running a complete Linux as a subsystem for driver support, and I have doubts Redox will have native drivers for all hardware within the next decade.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@programming.dev

Create post

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 399

    Posts

  • 2.9K

    Comments