You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
56 points

Finger guns are not covered under the 2nd amendment.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Well you see your honor: the hand is connected to the arm… And we have the right to bear arms so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Ah, the RFK Jr defense. Nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I prefer to have the right to Bear Arms, tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Then ask your bear to make a finger gun

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The arms are a right, the hands at the end of them are a privilege…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s the right to bear arms, not the right to bare arms!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes it does, finger guns 100% existed in the 18th century

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

But they should be covered under the 1st amendment. The problem is that children don’t have many rights in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 6.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 578

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators