this article is about how and why four of the world’s largest corporations are intentionally centralizing the internet and selling us horseshit. it’s a fun and depressing read about crypto, the metaverse, AI, and the pattern of behavior that led to all of those being pushed in spite of their utter worthlessness. here’s some pull quotes:

Web 3.0 probably won’t involve the blockchain or NFTs in any meaningful way. We all may or may not one day join the metaverse and wear clunky goggles on our faces for the rest of our lives. And it feels increasingly unlikely that our graphic designers, artists, and illustrators will suddenly change their job titles to "prompt artist” anytime soon.

I can’t stress this point enough. The reason why GAMM and all its little digirati minions on social media are pushing things like crypto, then the blockchain, and now virtual reality and artificial intelligence is because those technologies require a metric fuckton of computing power to operate. That fact may be devastating for the earth, indeed it is for our mental health, but it’s wonderful news for the four storefronts selling all the juice.

The presumptive beneficiaries of this new land of milk and honey are so drunk with speculative power that they’ll promise us anything to win our hearts and minds. That anything includes magical virtual reality universes and robots with human-like intelligence. It’s the same faux-passionate anything that proclaimed crypto as the savior of the marginalized. The utter bullshit anything that would have us believe that the meek shall inherit the earth, and the powerful won’t do anything to stop it.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-9 points

It’s not indistinguishable. People are choosing not to learn or understand how anything works. It more convenient to not know.

permalink
report
reply
-5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

it’s hardly news that VCs and shit spend influence and capital to shape perception and manufacture consent. it’s so not-news it was even literally mentioned in the very article this thread is about

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

golly fuck it’s been a pristine couple of days for posters to not read the article and then come in here and fucking make up what they figure the article says

these ones didn’t even bring mangled quotes to try and force their point, they just straight up didn’t open the link

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How did we get here? This is not my beautiful wife.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

programming dot dev, folks

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

it’s a two-rounder (check the youtube link in a priv)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

300 lines of LLM-laundered Python in a trenchcoat

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

modlog for this user is definitely something

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I fucking love taking a week off then coming back and finding these “sort by controversial” threads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

that sound you didn’t hear was the reference going entirely over your head

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Apparently you didn’t get it either since your unable to point out what exactly I missed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

this isn’t primary school and I’m not your favourite teacher, I’m not required to coddle your knowledge

but, you know, it’s funny? it’s weird, I did know what it meant! shocking, I know. but I did. that’s how, y’know, my reply had the shape it did. absolutely wild. people can know things! who knew?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

no thx, we don’t actually owe you shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I store my unable right next to my unicycle :)

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 420

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators