Edit: The paper is total nonsense. Sorry for wasting people’s time.
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 12 points
This (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927650524001130?via%3Dihub#sec0027) appears to be the actual paper the article is talking about.
22 points
Running the title though Google and looking at the discussions around it in various corners of the Internet seems to indicate it’s utter bunk.
7 points
Yeah , on top of how ad-infested and vague the article is and on top of the discussion I’ve seen about this paper elsewhere, it looks like at least one of the authors, Adrian David Cheok, doesn’t have any physics training according to his ORCID bio or his his wikipedia page, but has dabbled in AI according to the latter.
I wouldn’t be surprised if this is just some AI schlock.
4 points
3 points
3 points
1 point