good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Our preferential voting also helps to drag the main parties towards the middle too. But that seems unlikely to ever get in over there since it’d allow more than two parties

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oddly, IRV is actually seeing some success, slowly growing across the States. But compulsory voting is basically a non-starter over there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

USA trying to improve the electoral system!? Shocked Pikachu face

Surprisingly good news

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, it’s one of the very few advantages of the fact that their elections—even federal elections—are not actually standardised nationwide. States run them according to their own rules. Mostly this is a bad thing, but it does mean that one place can improve their system like this as an experiment, without needing to convince the entire country to do it at once.

So I think there are 2 states that do IRV currently. And there might be a few more places where IRV is used in non-congressional/presidential races.

permalink
report
parent
reply

AskBeehaw

!askbeehaw@beehaw.org

Create post

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.


Subcommunity of Chat


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 68

    Monthly active users

  • 74

    Posts

  • 305

    Comments