good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point
*

Mandatory voting, for people who have passed a morality test, and a competency test.

Nobody else is allowed to vote.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

for people who have passed a morality test

i don’t see how this is even theoretically tenable considering what is “moral” is entirely subjective and largely nonfalsifiable

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You really don’t want tests to prevent voting. They will be used entirely for voter supression.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah because there’s definitely no voter suppression going on already. Let’s make sure the dregs of society can share their dumbass opinions when things come to a general vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I suspect the people who would set this test would be the exact opposite of the people you want to set this test, in more than 50% of the seats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s a false equivalence. Building up society as a whole is better than trying to determine “the most relevant” voices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh, and a tax

permalink
report
parent
reply

AskBeehaw

!askbeehaw@beehaw.org

Create post

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.


Subcommunity of Chat


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 68

    Monthly active users

  • 74

    Posts

  • 305

    Comments