good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
15 points

Australia has compulsory voting with penalties for not voting. It ensures that people who don’t think they have a voice or that their vote doesn’t change anything actually are required to make their voice heard, even if they think that it doesn’t matter.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

We also have first past the post voting, so using said voice is never a waste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

FPTP is the shitty undemocratic system America and the UK use.

We use Instant Runoff Voting, which is a type of preferential (also called “ranked choice”) system. Which, as you say, means you aren’t wasting your vote by voting third party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My mistake, thanks for the correction!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Australia has a lot of really borderline fascist ideas. Not a great argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Some people in Australia absolutely have ideas like you describe, fortuitously the rest of us don’t have to vote for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
3 points

What does one have to do with the other?

permalink
report
parent
reply

AskBeehaw

!askbeehaw@beehaw.org

Create post

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.


Subcommunity of Chat


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 68

    Monthly active users

  • 74

    Posts

  • 305

    Comments