You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

He didn’t even have to, mythbusters did a show on it lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Idk why you’re being downvoted. They did, and you’re right. A door of that size made with accurate wood could hold two adult men out of the water when they removed their life vests and put them under the door.

If Jack and Rose had done the same, they would have increased the chance of survival for both of them by both being out of the water and having double the body heat to warm each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because you missed in the same episode during that part where David Cameron said that Leo’s character dying was what had to happen. That was the story. It is a pointless gotcha, based on the movie not spending the time to determine the exact amount of buoyancy of a ship wreck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Did they come up with that idea while floating in sub-freezing water, after having just experienced multiple near-death scenarios, while afraid for their lives? The reality is that it’s easy to solve a problem in a lab, not so much under duress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They try in the movie and it causes them both to be in the freezing water. It wasn’t about him being able to float, it was about them both not freezing to death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They don’t put the life vests under the door in the movie, which is the key detail tested by the Mythbusters.

permalink
report
parent
reply

> Greentext

!greentext@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 57

    Monthly active users

  • 344

    Posts

  • 2.2K

    Comments

Community moderators